Why no named-item tier list or value list is supportable yet, the current sample count, and the evidence threshold required before publication.
DIRECT ANSWER
The current evidence contains 2 observed trades, but 0 value-ready named-item records. Both samples lack verified item identities and comparable repeated offers.
The September 1 baseline said 80+; the current description says 100+. That signals a larger or redescribed collection, but does not identify new items, rarity, availability, or comparable trade values. Butter, Keyboard, and Animals are not automatic S-tier categories. No complete roster, repeat market observations, or creator-published value system was collected.
This is an editorial threshold, not an official market rule.
A value table needs at least 20 auditable trades overall before the first publication.
A named item needs at least three comparable dated appearances, not one screenshot.
Quantity, counterpart, date, source, and uncertainty must remain attached to every record.
These rows verify that XP outcomes appear after trades. They cannot price any item.
| Date | Timestamp | Items shown | XP shown | Value-ready? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | 04:21 | 3 vs 3 | 472 | No — names not verified |
| 2026-08-13 | 11:03 | 4 vs 4 | 1,225 | No — names not verified |
The official page was checked for roster and value data. Two dated public trades were logged only where the completed XP message and visible item-icon counts were clear. Names in the collection wording were not converted into ranks.
Include the exact item labels, quantities, both offers, date, outcome, and a public source. A single claimed price is recorded as an observation, never adopted as a market fact.
No named-item ranking is supportable yet because the checked sources do not expose a complete roster, comparable stats, or repeatable trade values.
No. It is a publication-status page and evidence ledger.
At minimum, a verified item name plus multiple comparable observations per item, with dates, context, and uncertainty retained.
